Some people do everything in a template, and while I don't work that way, you can work that way. Cubase's browsing system and preset systems are the best in class, and I simply love Cubase's ability to save and re-load effect chains, track presets, and project templates. ![]() Certain parallel processing, very intricate side chaining, or mid-side effect chaining is much easier to do in Studio One.Ĭubase also has the simplest bounce/freeze/render and the BEST stem-rendering and import/export features of any DAW. To be fair, Studio One has some really awesome multi-band and parallel routing features built into the DAW that are not EASY in Cubase, but are possible. I feel StudioOne more or less forces the "rack instrument" VST model on me and I don't like that. I find the StudioOne way of separating tracks from channels as a forced workflow annoying, whereas Cubase offers me both "traditional VST tracks" (because Steinberg invented VSTs, it does them well) and a "rack instrument" model, which is useful in some cases, but more work. I personally like the way Cubase works with VSTs better than the way that StudioOne works with VST instruments. If you want a friendly easy to learn, and very reliable DAW, studio one is wonderful. ![]() If you need incredibly powerful and deep mixing and editing features, nothing beats Cubase. If you mostly work IN THE BOX with a bit of vocals, and a lot of electronic VST instruments, Bitwig has many advantages. What genre do you work in and do you need a flexible DAW that can do everything Ableton does and more? Bitwig is like Ableton, but not crashy, and far more powerful, and with its clip launcher and push/launchpad integration, if you have ableton-type DAW controllers in your setup, Bitwig will just feel like home Bitwig is kind of a super ableton, but it lacks things that Studio One and Cubase can offer you for things like recording live instrument and vocal performances and then mixing editing live vocals or instrumentals. If you have been a long time Ableton user, you should consider bitwig as well. The new midi remote control editing and assignment features are unbeatable. Cubase recently (Cubase 12) got perhaps the nicest and most powerful way of setting up all your MIDI control surfaces that I have ever seen. The drag and drop features in Studio One are very nice. Cubase is incredibly powerful, probably more powerful than Studio One, but the workflow is simpler in Studio One. Here's the docs for Collection Management.īoth Cubase and Studio One are wonderful. Like a button in your car's instrument panel you just never bothered to push before. ![]() ![]() Then I realized, I've been using Cubase for 5 years and never encountered it in cubase but it was there right in front of me. I accidentally enabled this feature in studio one and it drove me nuts until I learned what it was and how to turn it off. After studying it a bit, I realized it was also a feature in cubase that also would annoy me if it was activated in cubase. I recently got enraged at studio one for a feature that I thought was insane. But hopefully they never blacklist GrooveAgent.Ĭubase is enraging at times, but so is every daw, because it's a dense UI and it's full of little decisions that make sense to nobody except some guy in Berlin who coded it that way. For things that are not shipped by Steinberg, you can also get enraged by the Plugin Blacklisting blackhole, which will cause VSTs to disappear. When you can't find Groove Agent it's probably because you have a collection set up up that filters your available instrument list down. So cubase has a filtering and collections system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |